第15次开课

开始:2025-08-25

截止:2026-01-15

课程已进行至

19/21周

成绩预发布时间 2026-01-14

教学团队

四川外国语大学
副教授
四川外国语大学
副教授
四川外国语大学
副教授
四川外国语大学
教授
四川外国语大学
教授
四川外国语大学
讲师
讲师
四川外国语大学
讲师
四川外国语大学
讲师

课程特色

视频(28)
考试(25)
文档(3)
讨论(3)

Describe the 'Dao' in one word.

By 张婷 老师 11-30 1674次浏览

Please describe 'Dao' in one word. Also, consider: in what aspects does your chosen word fail to fully express the 'Dao'?
“用一个词描述‘道’。同时思考:你的这个词,在哪些方面无法完全表达‘道’?

312 回复

  • 4班李思凝 19天前

    One word for "Dao" is Flux, yet this term only captures its dynamic, ever-changing side while failing to reflect its eternal, static essence and practical guidance for human life.

    回复
  • 夏嘉兴八班 19天前

    containment

    回复
  • 赵天恩20202305 19天前

    Wholeness

    Limitations:

        1.    Fails to convey its dynamic nature of constant flow and transformation (e.g., "Dao generates one, one generates two").

        2.    Overlooks its dual connotation as both the universal origin and the guiding principle for human conduct.

        3.    Loses the ineffability of "Dao"—the term resists fixed definition, while "wholeness" implies a definable, static totality.

    回复
  • 易曼3班 19天前

    Everything 

    回复
  • 尹子齐5班 19天前

    In anywhere and in anytime.But is invisible.

    回复
  • 3班王怡 19天前

    Chosen word: Eternal

    The word "eternal" captures the timeless, unchanging nature of the Dao as the fundamental force that transcends time and space in Taoist philosophy. However, it fails to express the Dao’s dynamic and immanent aspects: the Dao is not just a static, eternal entity but also the active principle that generates and sustains all things in the universe, guiding their cyclical changes and growth. Additionally, "eternal" does not convey the Dao’s ineffability—Laozi states that the Dao that can be named is not the true Dao, yet "eternal" is a concrete descriptor that reduces the Dao’s boundless, indescribable essence to a single temporal quality. It also overlooks the Dao’s accessibility in everyday life, as it is present in all mundane things and actions, not just an abstract "eternal" concept beyond human experience.

    回复
  • 黄艺5班 19天前

    Flow. Fails in expressing Dao's stillness, paradox, and its nature as the unnameable source beyond mere movement.

    回复
  • 郑羽彤7班 19天前

    Ineffable

    回复
  • 李青岱 19天前

    the way of the world

    回复
  • 5班邓雯文 19天前

    One word for 'Dao': Unfathomable

     

    Limitations of the word:

     

    1. "Unfathomable" only emphasizes the incomprehensibility of Dao, but Dao is also the source of all existence and the natural order governing the universe—this word does not capture its creative and regulative essence.

    2. Dao is both transcendent (beyond human perception) and immanent (present in all things), yet "unfathomable" focuses solely on its unknowable side and ignores its immanent, tangible presence in daily life and nature.

    3. Additionally, Dao represents a way of living (the path of virtue and harmony) for humans, while "unfathomable" has no connotation of practical guidance or ethical meaning.

    回复
  • 曾思雨8班 19天前

    The word "Flow" captures the Dao's dynamic, unforced, and continuous nature—the way water or the seasons move without struggle. However, it fails in several critical ways. Thus, while "Flow" points in a useful direction, it ultimately simplifies, sentimentalizes, and circumscribes the profound mystery it seeks to denote.

    回复
  • 6班彭诗涵 19天前

    One word: Order

    Where it fails:

    1. Too rational and structured: Dao is also formless, nameless, and includes chaos and spontaneity.

    2. Not dynamic enough: “Order” sounds static, while Dao is a flowing, ever‑changing process.

    3. Lacks the ethical dimension: Dao is also the way to live, not just cosmic arrangement.

    4. Too conceptual: Dao is said to transcend full definition, while “order” is a clear, limited concept.

    回复
  • 8班赵绿宇 19天前

    Ineffability — Dao's transcendence beyond all names, forms, and conceptual understanding

    回复
  • 陈柏先8班 19天前

    notion,But it's a concept without cognitive standards

    回复
  • 3班王祎珣 19天前

    natural

    回复
  • 陈丽莎 19天前

    Daoism

    回复
  • 徐雪玲五班 19天前

    Dimension limitation: "Origin" focuses on "source and foundation", only covering the generative attribute of "Tao begetting all things", but cannot reflect the dynamics and restrictiveness of "Tao" as the operating law of all things (such as natural laws and life principles), ignoring the characteristic that "Tao flows and operates in all things".

    回复
  • 尹海利 19天前

    Describe "Dao" in One Word

    Origin

    Aspects Where This Word Fails to Fully Express "Dao"

    1. "Origin" emphasizes a static attribute of being the source, while "Dao" embodies both static origin and dynamic operational laws

    2. "Origin" refers to a concrete concept of a starting point, while "Dao" possesses an abstractness that transcends language

    3. "Origin" does not include the practical attribute of "Dao"

    回复
  • 7班张雅玉 19天前

    Ultimate."Ultimate" focuses on finality, but Dao’s core is creative—birthing all existence.

    回复
  • 彭星月3班 19天前

    Nature

    回复
  • 孙琪然04 19天前

    One word for Dao: Everything.

     Dao is not the sum of all things (everything), but the source and underlying principle that gives rise to and governs all things. It is the force behind "everything", not the things themselves.

    回复
  • 7班卢姗姗 19天前

    free

    回复
  • 2班严婞予 19天前

    Way.

    It fails because Dao is not merely a path or method: it is ineffable, prior to language, both source and process, embracing paradox, emptiness, and non-action beyond any fixed concept.

     

    回复
  • 8班孙逸羽 19天前

    Way.

    Transcends Form and NameSpontaneity and Non-Action (Wuwei)
    Source of All Things
    Unity of Opposites
    Ineffability

    回复
  • 05周婷 19天前

     

    Limitations: "Flow" captures Dao’s dynamic, effortless movement and unity, yet it falls short by implying a mere natural process, missing Dao’s metaphysical depth as the formless source of all. It risks simplifying its paradoxes—being both transcendent and immanent, action and non-action. "Flow" may also overlook Dao’s ethical dimension (e.g., wuwei) and its ineffable mystery beyond conceptualization. Thus, while evoking its rhythm, the word cannot contain Dao’s boundless, nameless essence.

    回复
  • RmKgMASs 19天前

    liberated

    回复
  • 王伯柠4班 19天前

    origin. Because Tao, the origin, can cultivate one to two to three, further everything. Whereas, the origin may be an entity to a large extent, but Tao isn't.

    回复
  • 邓歆卉02班 19天前

    nature,but it also contains the rules governing the operation of all things.

    回复
  • 钱函壹4班 19天前

    Unity,it reflects Dao’s oneness of all existence yet misses its ineffable, indescribable essence beyond tangible unity.

    回复
  • 兰雨菲4班 19天前

    Wholeness.Wholeness fails to capture Dao’s dynamic fluidity, ineffable transcendence, and core attribute of spontaneous natural order.

    回复

添加回复