第2次开课

开始:2019-03-04

截止:2019-06-28

课程已进行至

17/17周

成绩预发布时间 2019-06-27

期末考试截止时间 2019-06-26 23:55

教学团队

湖北大学
副教授
湖北大学
湖北大学
湖北大学
讲师
湖北大学
讲师
湖北大学
讲师
湖北大学
助教

课程特色

直播(1)
视频(48)
考试(37)
讨论(10)
下载资料(2)
文档(2)
PPT(6)
作业(1)

如果您是刘欣,在下周与Trish Reagon关于中美贸易战的辩论,您会选取哪些支撑材料来说服您的对手和美国观众?

By 周红兵 老师 2019-05-26 2637次浏览

背景:

近日,中国国际电视台(CGTN)主播刘欣和美国福克斯商业频道(Fox Business)主播翠西·里根(Trish Regan)的一场隔空激辩引来网友广泛关注。之后双方经过多次隔空互动,,并定下美国时间5月29日晚8点,即北京时间下周四早8点,在Trish Reagon节目中辩论。

讨论问题:

If you were Liu Xin,what kinds of supporting materials you would use in your debating with Trish Reagon? How would you persuade Trish Reason and American audiences ? (如果您是刘欣,在下周与Trish Reagon关于中美贸易战的辩论,您会选取哪些支撑材料来说服您的对手和美国观众?)
 

38 回复

  • Answerss 2019-05-26

    The United States imposed sanctions on Chinese enterprises by way of state intervention. Zte came before, and huawei came after. The essence of this matter is absurd. They try to support their position that they are victims of the sino-us relationship by some totally unscientific data

    回复
  • 朱利闻 2019-05-26

    There are two fundamental things about our approach to America that are our strongest and most reliable guarantee. The first is our system with Chinese characteristics. I think their main goal is not to eliminate the trade deficit, but to eliminate our institutional advantage. If they touch our bottom line, our bottom line of life, survival, development, I believe that our President xi, our government is completely able to deal with, it is impossible to give up our bottom line. The other is our huge domestic market. There is no such a big market in the world any more. Our consumer market and investment market give us huge leeway. Finally, we have to thank trump for being a good teacher to the Chinese people.
    To us Chinese, it seems, we put their own house in order, to do a good job of the adjustment, seek the development of the high speed into the development of high quality, over the years, our goal to achieve national revival in one hundred, this is our victory, they want to stop our progress in this respect is impossible, so if they want to delay our development speed: I think I can understand, if it wants to end we that is impossible! It was a dream!

    回复
  • 陈小小 2019-05-26

    1.China has a large population, a large number of imported goods and a large purchasing base.

    2.China has a plentiful labor force, and many factories are open in China to recruit Chinese workers

    3.Friendship always comes first, and a trade war would put the relationship between many Chinese and American friends at risk

    4.A trade war could lead to a brief peace, but it could also lead to a more drastic response. After all, our foreign ministry spokesman said, "we in China have no fear of anyone."

    回复
  • 微炎 2019-05-27

    1、China's economy has a strong bearing capacity. The socialist market economy has obvious institutional advantages in      dealing with various difficulties and risks.

    2、China's all-round opening up is not entirely dependent on a country or a region.

    3、Trump's government is making enemies everywhere, and it is hard to get the support of the international community to continue.

    回复
  • 吕浩 2019-05-27

       Although we haven't seen much detailed data research so far, China's counter-measures have affected 2.5% of U.S. imports in the Sino-U.S. trade war. The rise in some commodity prices led to a 0.1% rise in CPI, with little overall impact. At the same time, in the capital market, the US stock market did not suffer a significant decline in the value of stocks due to the trade war.            
        The Institute of World Economics and Politics has built a data model based on the reality. With a 30% increase in tariffs between China and the United States, China's GDP may fall by about 1%, manufacturing output by 3%, employment by 1.86%, and imports and exports by some extent.            
          In the short run, once a trade war begins, China will lose more than the United States, which is why the United States dares to launch a trade war. But China's affordability is much higher than that of the United States. China's current losses are controllable and compensatable. In the long run, the results are more complex and difficult to determine. 

    回复
  • 距离de天空 2019-05-27
    • Sino-US trade relations are essentially mutually beneficial and win-win.The US side has gained real benefits from Sion-US trade.At prsent,China is at the middle and low end of the industrial chain in the international division of labor,forming a situation of "surplus in China and profit in the United States".American enterprises have achieved great success in investing in China.
    回复
  • 金毛小黑米 2019-05-28

    Any additional broad-based tariff would worsen U.S. inequity and "punish American working families" with higher prices on household basics like clothing, shoes and electronics.

    回复
  • 阿尔法狗子 2019-05-28

    回复
  • 周苗苗 2019-05-28

    America launched a trade war against China  which has hurt almost every area of the U.S. economy. Beer, science and technology, automobile and other industries have been impacted. The stock market in the U.S. has also been shocked, and agriculture has been the first to bear the brunt.

    回复
  • charlotteack 2019-05-28

    The first is the system with Chinese characteristics, which is our most fundamental support. The other is our huge domestic market. There is no such big market in the world. Our consumer market and investment market give us great room for manoeuvre, so their blockade will ultimately make us more vigorous.

    回复
  • 森罗万象 2019-05-28

    The facts show that it is the Trump administration of the United States that has repeatedly made strategic misjudgments and created the "Thucydides trap." They ignore the rules of the WTO, ignore the opposition of the international community, ignore the opposition of the American people, and arbitrarily arbitrarily provoke a Sino-US trade war. They impose punitive tariffs on China, especially to contain and combat "Made in China 2025". And interfere with China's high-end manufacturing and technological innovation development. This kind of trade protectionism, the implementation of extreme pressure and blackmail, completely wearing colored glasses to observe each other, is to create a "Thucydide trap", completely lost international credibility and lost credibility.
     

    回复
  • If i were Liu Xin , i would analyze China's own advantages and disadvantages and make a more accurate judgment for China's future development. And for America ,we should, too. As a "superpower", the US still has a powerful power that can not be ignored. And China should also focus on innovation, making Chinese made into Chinese created. Strong technology is the way to go.

    回复
  • 周红兵 老师 2019-05-28

    @朱利闻 yes

    回复
  • 周红兵 老师 2019-05-28

    @陈小小 yes

    回复
  • 周红兵 老师 2019-05-28

    @阿尔法狗子 yes

    回复
  • 周红兵 老师 2019-05-28

    @charlotteack yes

    回复
  • 刘文靖 2019-05-29

    Neither side of the "sino-us trade war" should applaud the trump administration's choice. Any behind an economic war, especially like China and the United States economic between the leadership of the world economy, it is destined to be the result of the including the people, China and the United States and the world public welfare impact at a time, if the government would start trump, determined to play, then society, China and the United States and the international community will be forced to add for the "war" on the check. The impact of the war on some industries, the loss of jobs, the rise of consumption and the impact on China's economic development. In turn, the United States will suffer the same, even worse, effects that we as ordinary people need to be prepared for

    回复
  • 大萝卜 2019-05-29

    1.I think everyone knows that trade is mutually beneficial and win-win. It is not America's favor to buy things with China. It is the fact that the United States does not produce these things, and that domestic demand must be imported from the international market. The United States can import from China or from other countries. Imports from China are due to lower prices and better product quality. Of course, some products can be produced by the United States itself, such as ready-made clothes, shoes and other necessities of life, but if they are produced at home, the cost will be very high, people will pay a very high price.2.We hope that trade disputes can be settled through negotiation, that China and the United States can live in friendship, and that trade between China and the United States is conducive to the development of both countries and the improvement of people's living standards. But if things fail to meet our expectations, trade negotiations fail to reach an agre

    回复
  • 苟宇潇 2019-05-29

    China-US trade relations are mutually beneficial in nature. The US side has gained tangible benefits from China-US trade. At present, China is at the middle and lower end of the industrial chain in the international division of labor, resulting in a situation where the surplus is in China and the profit is in the United States. American companies have been a huge success in investing in China

    回复
  • 杰出 2019-05-29

    China is the second largest economy in the world, the first manufacturer of industrial products, the first trading country of goods and the first foreign exchange reserve country. China has grown into a typical economic power with the ability to withstand risks on a super-large scale, which can not be shaken in a moment.
     

    回复
  • 艺兴只读圣贤书 2019-05-29

    1。 China  has been  playing a  remarkable  role in  world   economic .  Thats  kind  of  work   America   cant  do.

     

    回复
  • 霍霍霍 2019-05-29

    1) Sino-US trade relations are essentially mutually beneficial, and the US side has gained tangible benefits from Sino-US trade. At present, China is in the middle and low end of the industrial chain in the international division of Labor, forming a situation of "surplus in China, profit in the United States". The investment of American enterprises in China has been a great success. 2) The US 301 investigation report on China is biased. The questionnaire cited in the 301 survey report was very unprofessional, and USTR was clearly misleading when quoting the relevant data. At the same time, the United States exaggerates the impact of China's high-tech investment in the United States, ignoring the fact that the main position of China's foreign investment is in Asia, Latin America 3) China has earnestly fulfilled its commitments at the time of its accession to the WTO, perfected its domestic legal framework, slashed tariffs to a low level worldwide, continuously strengthened its legislation and law enforcement efforts to protect intellectual property rights, and continuously improved the transparency of laws and rules. The US has previously argued that China has failed to live up to its commitments, and China has produced evidence that China's commitments are not enough to be heavy enough to be a typical unilateral self-interest manifestation.

    回复
  • 王钰锋 2019-05-29

    Generally speaking ,the trade war between China and US will harm both of us ,in many areas china has important cooperate with US,from many statistics we can see ,

    In the side of raw material and labor market ,China has the absolutely right of speech 

    Although the economy of US is the first in the world ,but China has the greast increasing speed in industry and trade,we have power to slow down america's development 

    According to HUAWEI incident,we can say ,in science of 5G and communication we have many Chinese companis to support our need ,and US government fabricate some rumor to defame our company  revealed that those politicians already exhausted, And they also can not give an perfect answer why federal express got a mistake in sending 4 malis from  HUAWEI  to US ,unless they are deliberate to strike Chinese company.

    So ,in communication technology and mature samrt applications market ,china has abilities to supply , if must said who will be striked heavily in this trade war , they will be America's peasantry and these intelligent manufacturing companies . 

    回复
  • 蛋糕 2019-05-29

    In this trade war initiated by the United States, China must not retreat or compromise, seek opportunities in competition, seek development in risk, and allow the hegemonism of the United States to develop. It should fight back. If we compromise blindly, the other side will gain every inch and lose the right to negotiate. Therefore, after the United States has put forward some measures, the Chinese government will put forward some counter-measures. The purpose of counter-measures is to better sit down and talk between the two sides. However, it is necessary to avoid intensifying the contradictions between the two sides as far as possible.

    回复
  • Nena 2019-05-29

    The purpose of the US side's unjustified criticism of China is to cover up its unilateralism and protectionist practices.

    China does not want to fight a trade war, but it is not afraid to fight a trade war. It will continue to take effective measures to resolutely safeguard national and people's interests, and firmly safeguard economic globalization and the multilateral trading system.

    回复
  • 陈珊 2019-05-29

    First,  point out the problems with Tracy. It can be seen from her statement that she is an extremely emotion person. Secondly with the fact that Tracy use the 600billion case incorrectly, she was rejected.  Finally show your altitude. 

    回复
  • 葛浩菁 2019-05-29

    In essence,CHINA-US trade relations are mutally beneficial and win-win.The US side has gained tangible benefits from CHINA-US trade.Currently,China is at the middle and low end of the industrial chain in the international division of labor.

    回复
  • 梁奕 2019-05-29

    The US trade deficit with China is quite normal, including with many other countries such as Japan and South Korea. But the export profits of these deficits are not all earned by China. The high-end products are made in China by American capital and technology and then exported to the United States. For example, the price of Apple's mobile phone is 275 US dollars after it is assembled and assembled in China. The profit of Chinese enterprises is less than 30 US dollars. The chips and cameras inside are from Japan, Korea and the United States. China just assembles to earn a little labor, land and energy consumption. Low-end products like clothes, shoes and toys are less profitable, less than 5%.And from the macro point of view, if the US dollar is to be the world currency, it is doomed to be in a long-term deficit. The US dollar can only be the world currency through trade to all countries in the world. How can we always earn it back? When the world economy grows at a high speed as the US dollar measured by the world economy, the United States must be in a huge deficit to show its economic growth.

    回复
  • hhhh 2019-05-29

    The Sino-US trade war does not conform to objective economic laws .The launch of a trade war by the United States is not conducive to the economic development of the two countries .

    回复
  • Chay 2019-05-29

      The aim of this speech to persuade the Trish and American audiences that is meaningless and hazard to both of China and America.

      So I would choose the supporting under materials:

    1.The statistics about the America companys in China and Chinese company in America to show the high mergeing of our countries.

    2.The examples of big development space of the market between China and America.Showing the common 'Cake'

    3.The example of the damage brought by this economy war.Showing its meaningless.

     

    回复

添加回复