Analyze the poem's structure (three stanzas, each with a distinct stage in the argument). How does the progression of stanzas mirror the speaker's escalating persuasion?
In John Donne's "The Flea", each stanza represents a distinct stage in his argument, moving from gentle reasoning to bold assertion and finally to triumphant conclusion.
The first stanza functions as a foundational setup: the speaker introduces the flea as a symbolic bridge between himself and the beloved, framing their “union” (via mingled blood) as innocent and natural. He argues that this mingling is innocent, "No sin, nor shame, nor loss of maidenhead" , suggesting their physical union would be equally harmless.
The second stanza marks a turn to defense and escalation. The speaker anticipates the beloved's next move: killing the flea. He responds by elevating the flea's significance from a symbol of union to a sacred space ("Our marriage bed,,and marriage temple")—and killing it to a moral crime ("three sins in killing three"). This phase is more urgent, as the speaker actively counters the beloved’s resistance.
The third stanza is the climactic resolution of the argument. The beloved has already killed the flea. Rather than expressing dismay, he uses her triumph as evidence for his argument. She claims "Find'st not thyself nor me the weaker now" after killing the flea, which he immediately twists to his advantage: he uses her own action to prove that her fears about physical intimacy are baseless. If killing the flea (which contained their "mingled blood") caused no harm, then yielding to him would similarly not diminish her honor.
The three-stanza structure thus not only creates a satisfying poetic form but also serves as a blueprint for persuasive rhetoric itself.
您确定给 “
