Here are two versions of English answers for the question Why historians disagree? — a concise one for quick replies and a detailed one for in-depth discussion:
Concise Version
Historians disagree mainly because they approach historical events from different perspectives (e.g., political, economic, cultural), select and interpret historical sources differently, and new discoveries or research methods constantly reshape historical understanding. Additionally, their personal values and the social context of their time also influence their judgments.
Detailed Version
There are several key reasons why historians hold different views on historical events:
1. Diverse perspectives and standpoints
Historians often analyze history through distinct lenses, such as Marxist, liberal, or cultural history. Their personal beliefs,
Historians disagree mainly because of differences in sources (access to, interpretation of, and reliability of historical materials), varying perspectives and biases (influenced by their background, ideology, or the era they live in), and distinct methodologies (approaches like political history vs. social history or quantitative vs. qualitative analysis).
Historians disagree mainly because of differences in sources (access to, interpretation of, and reliability of historical materials), varying perspectives and biases (influenced by their background, ideology, or the era they live in), and distinct methodologies (approaches like political history vs. social history or quantitative vs. qualitative analysis).
Historians disagree mainly because of differences in sources (access to, interpretation of, and reliability of historical materials), varying perspectives and biases (influenced by their background, ideology, or the era they live in), and distinct methodologies (approaches like political history vs. social history or quantitative vs. qualitative analysis).